Its just a question. I'm not asking you to prove anything. I just want to know what your rationale here is. You insist the subpoenas don't exist. Pompeo and Giuliani - the people who received them - confirm that they do. Why do you still believe they don't exist?
I already answered the question in the way I want to.
Which was no answer at all, because you're a coward.
I don't care what you want to know. I don't owe you an explanation to you and your missing evidence designed to distract from your own inability to prove your premise. You can't provide the subpoena, so clearly you are a coward.
You don't owe me an explanation but it sure would help you to not look like a dishonest dick if you provided one.
The difference between me and you is I am
unable to provide a copy of the subpoena whereas you are
unwilling to answer the question of why you still believe subpoenas received by Pompeo and Giuliani don't exist. How could the subpoenas not exist if they acknowledged receiving them?

