Re: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son
My recognized inability to produce the subpoenas doesn't prevent you from being able to answer my question. Why would you still believe the subpoenas don't exist when Pompeo and Giuliani, their recipients, acknowledged receiving them?
Surely if you had a rational reason for not believing Pompeo and Giuliani, you would answer the question.
Surely if you had a rational reason for not believing Pompeo and Giuliani, you would answer the question.
It doesn't prevent me at all. What prevents me from answering is because it serves as a mechanism of distraction from your inability to produce the subpoenas.
You refuse to budge off this one particular point because you get schooled every time you try to approach the topic from another angle. First you tried to bring up the equivalence of believing in Bigfoot, then you tried to talk about courts of record, then you tried to redefine what a house clerk does. Now you are hanging on to this one stupid rock as a tidal wave of evidence smothers you.
If you had a decent answer to my question, you would give it. But you don't, so you won't. Keep hanging on to that rock if its all you've got.