refuse to prove that he isn't a tax fraud
That's not how it works.. A person should never have to prove a negative..
If you want him for tax fraud you have to prove he committed tax fraud..
A person does not need to prove the opposite of an accusation, the accusation needs to be proved by the accuser..
And to be fair, why would OG release his.
Right, even if he is guilty, he is not required to present evidence against himself..
"nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" 5Th ammendment..
Taxes : with a good account you can have a legit business and not pay taxes.
Even better, you can make a loss and then claim taxes for years (refer Donald Trump)
The smarter you are the less taxes you pay..
Their is nothing immoral about paying as little taxes as possible..
People of the internet, this fight Vod / OG has been dragging for ages.
This isn't all that bad..
I think the best way to finish it is to get all the facts out..
Vod doesn't have to post any proof of his claim about being offered nasty shares just like OGNasty doesn't have to post his tax information..