Does anyone think the default trust is being used for character attacks rather than trustworthiness? I have no stake in what's going nor do I even know the full story but in seems a few months ago a lot of people on default trust had less negative feedback on their accounts. Probably not in the best interest for people trying to gauge trust of a member but I'd concede there are conversations to be had if allegations have some truth to them. Again, this is me not knowing the full story in this thread.
A number of people left me negative feedback regarding my public dox of OG. Theymos called for forgiveness, and a number of people cherry picked his words to leave more negative feedback.
OG also received a large amount of negative feedback, but received an unique show of support when he returned the coin he was obligated to, or go on the run with his family.
I continue to count on time and OG's posts to expose him on the forum, as he was exposed IRL by the IRS.
I get what you're saying. It's fair. Earlier this year I remember both yourself and OG not having any negative feedback by DT members and it seems there's been a lot of cross linking with DT members leaving each other negative trust with a lot of character attacks. Depending whether the allegations are true or not, I guess it's fair but I'd probably need to actually read up on the situation myself quite frankly. From what I'm gather in this thread it's a long convoluted story that I'm not sure I'll fully understand lmao
Will leave this here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgS50Y06bnY
