@Quickseller,
I don't understand why you think collecting data about earned merit, trust settings, edited posts, support/opposition of trust flags... is acceptable, but a list of URLs found in users' signatures is not.
If you are concerned about privacy why aren't you complaining about LoyceV's trust setting viewer, or trust flag support/opposition pages? That seems like a much more a breach of individual privacy.
I want to point out that the only way someone could have
this information is if they are conducting de-facto surveillance on the entire forum on an ongoing basis. There is no other way to detect the start/end dates of signature campaign like this, nor the 'users', 'posts', and 'deleted' columns.
There is absolutely no personal information to be found in the post you referenced above. Unless you're conserved about the privacy of the services being advertised, and frequency their URLs can be found in users' signatures.
This is further evidence that all posts made by anyone is being collected (surveilled).
This is evidence that this person has a database of every post in the forum.
Again, the forum
is the database. Of course all the posts are collected, they are collected right here. If they weren't publicly available, suchmoon would have no access to them.
Disclaimer: I'm not complaining about LoyceV's trust pages. I find them very useful, and don't believe they are a breach of privacy. All the information is publicly available, LoyceV just makes it more easily accessible.