I never understood the reason of banning the account if the affiliate is doing IP faucet abuse. Now if the affiliate is like that too I would understand but if the person is using a totally different IP and from another country and what not yet his affiliates are all from the same place then you should ban the ones that register under him but not the guy who invited the people there because it looks like he has no guilt. Yet on this occasion it looks like the guy was using a data center and VPN that was same with the others so it would be totally understandable.
I am always afraid of one bad person coming into this website under my affiliate (I have links in many places) and doing something bad and getting me banned as well, I hope you would take that into consideration before banning people but this is not for this instance, it is for general purposes.
The difference is it wasn't just one bad affiliate. All their referral income was generated by a bot I have seen many times before. It looks like they might be telling the truth about having advertised their link as well as there are a number of random hits on the link that didn't sign up accounts. The active ones all do a free roll one a few seconds after the other in the same order they signed up in and then play multiply BTC with the free winnings, not to win but to turnover as much referral income as they can.
If one of your affiliates turns into an abuser they would signup those accounts under their referral link, not yours. There is no reason they would abuse just to generate referral income for someone else.
they may be motivated to receive interest income from a referrer. In any case, I asked you to provide proof of your words in private messages, so that my doubts would be dispelled, if its not difficult for you, do it.
I've read the whole conversation, and I don't understand what other proof do you need?
~ The active ones all do a free roll one a few seconds after the other in the same order they signed up in and then play multiply BTC with the free winnings, not to win but to turnover as much referral income as they can.
~
Isn't what's above is enough? I mean, what are the odds of them being not the same person?
You may argue that they are still not you, but can you calculate the profitability of such activity, if they were not you? Wouldn't it be more profitable for them to keep the satoshi they earn from the faucet instead of losing all of it to wagering?