Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807
hv_ spake thusly:
Note the use of _protocol_.
To which BitcoinFX replied:
Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807
hv_ spake thusly:
My advice: Look into the Version 0.1
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Note the use of _protocol_.
To which BitcoinFX replied:
*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...
Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21
Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21
Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21
Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21
Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.
So you're implying that 0.1 isn't an implementation of the protocol but 0.2 and 0.3 are?
Im not implying anything. I am explicitly stating that the client version 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are all implementations of client code that run the same version of the same protocol.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implementation
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_protocol
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_protocol
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocol
This is what happens when you believe in people who were clearly not around during Bitcoin (BTC) inception, over and above people who were knowingly around.
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188
...
Yep, more lies from CSW (and in a court of law) ...
Fraudtoshi caught lying for the 1682486764083181486th time.
https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1199301450863505408
WizSec Bitcoin Research
@wizsecurity
Craig Wright says he "definitely knows" he mined these bitcoins and sent them to Mike Hearn, but anyone who spends more than 5 minutes googling those historical transactions will realize this is actually Hearn's address
Debunked more than 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080936
Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?
In chronological order.
23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.
14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.
16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.
16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.
18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.
18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.
18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.
18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.
18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.
18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.
18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.
https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1199301450863505408
WizSec Bitcoin Research
@wizsecurity
Craig Wright says he "definitely knows" he mined these bitcoins and sent them to Mike Hearn, but anyone who spends more than 5 minutes googling those historical transactions will realize this is actually Hearn's address
Debunked more than 2 years ago:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080936
Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?
In chronological order.
23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.
14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.
16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.
16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.
18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.
18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.
18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.
18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.
18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.
18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.
18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.
...
Thread ...
"Kleiman v. Wright - The bonded courier is back! 😂
In his latest "Objection" filing late yesterday, Craig #Faketoshi Wright doubles down on the Tulip Trust, bonded courier & being Satoshi bullsh*t.
Source, must read:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.311.0.pdf "
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1199219782379290624
...
- https://youtu.be/3kqLVeP7iHA
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin
Prove me wrong ! Still waiting !