Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
"We can't really understand if you are lazy to look up the messages or you don't have the skills to do it. We already answered about the white paper issue and all your accusations, but we'll give you a resume here so you can look up for the full messages about this"
I've read both white papers have have written extensively about the inconsistencies found.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145356.0
You understood that we talked about an already regulated token, when we clearly expressed by all ways that the BHF-TOKEN was not regulated and the yet to exist BHM-TOKEN will be regulated.
REALLY?
That quote is you bluehillfoundation.sup stating it IS REGULATED. It is not you clearly expressing all the ways the BHF-token was not regulated. You didn't even try to distinguish what token the STO was referring to. It is definitely very CLEAR that you LIED.
"The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering..."
"...fully Swiss regulated Security Token..." ie. a security token governed by the FINMA
Yes, your words are saying that the token IS ALREADY REGULATED, which is a LIE.
You are not alone bluehillfoundation.sup because the white-paper also LIES.
Version 6.3 (https://www.bluehillmining.com/docs/whitepaper.pdf)
"A fully regulated STO"...it is in black and white and very clear, a LIE.
then we have this:
The white paper is very specific- the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA licence...cough cough. you were caught with this lie.
As every project of this characteristics, that obviously you don't know about enough to understand, we talked in future and we presented it as what we intend this to become. And we are doing it as you could and can see in the roadmap.
Moreover, as every project, we have the total right and natural process of adapting the steps and items of the project and communicate them.
Do you know what a white paper is? Do you know what a governing financial body such as the FINMA does? One of its many jobs is to make sure that all investors have the relevant info to make an informed financial decision, and that the reported information is correct.
When an official warning is issued such as in your case, I don't have to try hard to de-credit you.
When a project changes, so should the white-paper. Blue Hill Mining white paper hasn't, which is suppose to be an official document. So the next time you have a hypocritical comment about being lazy look into a mirror.
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM
I've read both white papers have have written extensively about the inconsistencies found.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145356.0
You understood that we talked about an already regulated token, when we clearly expressed by all ways that the BHF-TOKEN was not regulated and the yet to exist BHM-TOKEN will be regulated.
REALLY?
B.H.Mining-STO
The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security
Token Offering that owns 30% of the Blue Hill Mine as
well as 30% of the Blue Hill Platform.
The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security
Token Offering that owns 30% of the Blue Hill Mine as
well as 30% of the Blue Hill Platform.
That quote is you bluehillfoundation.sup stating it IS REGULATED. It is not you clearly expressing all the ways the BHF-token was not regulated. You didn't even try to distinguish what token the STO was referring to. It is definitely very CLEAR that you LIED.
"The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering..."
"...fully Swiss regulated Security Token..." ie. a security token governed by the FINMA
Yes, your words are saying that the token IS ALREADY REGULATED, which is a LIE.
You are not alone bluehillfoundation.sup because the white-paper also LIES.
Version 6.3 (https://www.bluehillmining.com/docs/whitepaper.pdf)
"A fully regulated STO"...it is in black and white and very clear, a LIE.
then we have this:
The white paper is very specific- the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA licence...cough cough. you were caught with this lie.
As every project of this characteristics, that obviously you don't know about enough to understand, we talked in future and we presented it as what we intend this to become. And we are doing it as you could and can see in the roadmap.
Moreover, as every project, we have the total right and natural process of adapting the steps and items of the project and communicate them.
Do you know what a white paper is? Do you know what a governing financial body such as the FINMA does? One of its many jobs is to make sure that all investors have the relevant info to make an informed financial decision, and that the reported information is correct.
When an official warning is issued such as in your case, I don't have to try hard to de-credit you.
When a project changes, so should the white-paper. Blue Hill Mining white paper hasn't, which is suppose to be an official document. So the next time you have a hypocritical comment about being lazy look into a mirror.
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM