However, the same calculation with $200 usd works ( profit = $18*0.7 = $2.6 = 1%) and with $500 usd it is ($45*0.7 - 10 = $21 = 4.5%)
At this stage, I'm going to take part of the experiment, this doesn't mean I vouch and or support the bot or the OP.
I wish you the best of luck here dude, but the fact still remains that doubling the amount of funds on a backtest does not give accurate results, market depth comes into play - more funds on the same bot with the same algorithm will not give the same results.
will you be willing to show a full P&L as the test goes on?
Cheers,
I will do a full P&L as the test goes on.
I have a feeling that the OP is some kind of genius with a little bit of autism.
I genuinely asked him if i could as well have a free vps.
His answer was no (fine) but a quite arrogant answer.
I wasn't very pushy and asked him if he was wiling to reconsider based on the fact that I was legendary (oh well, this entitlement !) and that he wold still make 30% of my profit and that the 10$ wouldn't be much of a difference to him. Meanwhile he would gain a customer that could eventually put more fund.
He once again wrote about being a service provider and having terms and conditions and other BS.
Well, lacking people's skill.
Especially when, he is advertising free VPs for all when the "platform" is ready - before the end of the year.
Anyway, I will go forward, not that much at stake.
And even if the OP is not the best communicant, his product might be great.