Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 4 from 3 users
Re: History of local boards
by
DdmrDdmr
on 29/11/2019, 08:55:59 UTC
⭐ Merited by SFR10 (2) ,tranthidung (1) ,fillippone (1)
Local boards are an area of potential great growth. My local board, Spanish, is clearly underused in relation to the world population that speaks the language, and currently shows a great gap between current posting activity, and potential posting activity. There are other factors to weigh-in such as wealth, culture, technological settlement, and so forth, but the gap is pretty wide, and I do hope it eventually boosts (maybe SEO can help).
 
Just a additions to the data reflected in the OP:

- The Birthday of the Local Boards I think are, in some instances, that of a prior Language Thread. For example, the Spanish Local board figures as the oldest, born on the 24/09/2010, but it was really constituted as a local board on the 19/05/2011 (see Please create a Local/Castellano (Spanish) forum). This is just a technicality that I found to be true for my local board, albeit an important one for the board itself.

- Dealing with averages has it’s particularities. The longer the period of time, the more data points we flatten out into a single value, losing some perspective as to evolution of the values. Dealing with posts count numbers is a bit of a p.i.t.a., and at some point, I decided to follow these values for local board (not local threads) on a monthly basis, in order to get a better reading of post count evolution, and specially on it’s distribution over main+first level childboards (i.e. in order to separate Altcoin stuff from the rest).

For example, the Russian local board is currently generating just over 20k posts per month:
https://public.tableau.com/shared/W5QB867G7?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link

The Russian postcount, for example, differs from the overall average quite a bit (just under 700 new net(*) posts per day last month vs 1504 all time average). Altcoin now represents there around 7,88% of newly created posts, whilst on January 2018 it was 46,76%. It’s interesting to play around with the data (alas, manually retrieved each month), and retrieve information in the process.

(*) Net: created - deleted - moved