I didn't know about that. I don't see it as a violation of the treasury agreement, but it's... a bit tacky, I guess. I suppose an analogy would be a fine-art storage company selling selfies with famous artworks.
Thanks!
I never participate in these things. They're a series of risks & headaches for a chance at some profit.
In this case, the only "risk" was having to sign a message, and the expected profit was (more or less) known up-front.
According to the website you linked, 0.00625 Gigabyte/BTC was disbursed, so your calculations are off by a factor of 10.
Suchmoon is correct: that was for the later airdrops.
If the fork coins were property of the forum, any treasurer would owe the fork coins back to the forum, not the value of a hypothetical trade years before if there was no request to liquidate the fork coins at the time.
That is indeed what happened to the Forkcoins, but I wasn't talking about Forks.
I am unable to substantiate the 0.0625 GBYTE/btc rate on July 9 as stated in the post made by what appears to be a forum user unassociated with the GBYTE/Obyte project.
I followed the airdrop back then, and the quote is correct.
I don't really want to dig up all the details because I remember I checked some of the numbers of the airdrop back then, and they were all correct. My guess would be the amounts of Bitcoin that are now shown in the transition log were taken at a later date, for a later airdrop. You'll have to look up the funds on each address on the exact date if you want the exact amounts.
It appears likely that OgNasty received GBYTE from 5 distributions.
That could be, I didn't look any further as one airdrop was enough to ask for transparency.