Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
by
bluehillfoundation.sup
on 02/12/2019, 13:18:59 UTC
Mr Crypto-info:

It is starting to get a little hilarious this kind of accusation. It's really hard to talk and explain with seriousness while you are making this kind of nonsense description. We have talked to you for many months already, saying you exactly the reason why of everything that has happened 'till now. We don't pretend everyone to think and understand the way we do, but at least to think and try to understand in any way...

1- You are talking about the BHF-Token and you take a picture of one of the BHM-Whitepaper in one of the many versions (An old one) to back up your accusation to the BHF-Token:
UNDERSTAND IT FOR GOOD! Blue Hill Foundation goes with BHF-Token | Blue Hill Mining goes with BHM-Token. BHF-Token is not regulated and was never regulated. Show WHERE WE SAID THAT THE BHF-TOKEN WAS REGULATED? SHOW IT OR STOP TALKING NONSENSES.

2- "The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering...":
We said once again that this was a misuse of the verbal tense. We already apologized for this and we already explained that is OBVIOUS that if we are talking about a project yet to exist, yet to come, yet to be developed; so we are talking in a future present; we are talking about what it will be and what it will have, etc.. and it will be a FULLY REGULATED STO. Because IT WILL BE EXACTLY THAT, and the whitepaper all talks about our objective, the how and the when. Of course the project will change and it has had changes. IT'S A PROJECT... have you ever been part or taken action in a project? It's ironic that we have to explain something so obvious.

3- "the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA license...":
Let's be clear again on this, but with a different approach, as we know this can be hard to understand. We have not applied yet to the FINMA, and they have put us in warning list of their own, which is their job and obligation as regulators; not because it's something bad or something criminal, but because they must warn what is and what isn't regulated under their terms. They decided to put us in the non-regulated list and it's fair an ok as we didn't have regulated tokens! Of course, we are choosing the best regulator to apply to, among all the options in the table. FINMA is one of them but not the only one.

Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department