I didn't know about that. I don't see it as a violation of the treasury agreement, but it's... a bit tacky, I guess. I suppose an analogy would be a fine-art storage company selling selfies with famous artworks.

How about the other forks, the shittier ones than BCH?  There's like Bitcoin Gold, Diamond, Private, etc., and they aren't worth nothing by any means.  Not that this is any of my concern.  I'm just mildly curious.  When all of these forks happened I had zilch for bitcoin holdings and thus wasn't entitled to those ass nuggets masquerading as cryptocurrency.