Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: P2PB2B - resolving "scam alerts" and misunderstandings
by
mosprognoz
on 03/12/2019, 00:36:24 UTC
I was mostly interested by the "forced" part TBH is why I ended up making the post..

They were trying to start a Sig campaign without escrowing the funds. I "forced" them to find a reputable escrow for securing funds. Because in the Sig campaign thread there was not a single word about escrowing promised payments funds. After that, they found Lauda, who is one of the most trusted forum users and they are about to reach an agreement. The meaning of all this is that, any bounty campaign of any project even with one scam accusation must be escrowed via any reputable member, who offers such services. Is that project scam or not, must be decided by potential customers themselves after reading all related information. (Scams are not moderated on this forum.)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203715.msg53174942#msg53174942

They would run that sig campaign WITH or WITHOUT escrow. So now they are forced to escrow funds. WHICH one is better?

I just do not understand, why did you get involved in this conversation with some "smart statements" and ruined your legendary account with a red tag?