@twitchy
ALL OF THAT IS IRRELEVANT for the PURPOSES of this thread. Not interested in your " opinions" of what tman will do once extorting/blackmailing his 650bucks he got for 1 satoshi.
It does not matter if your ACTIONS are for the greater good ACCORDING TO TMAN, LAUDA, YOGG and the other scum bags here.
Please stop conflating this thread with some other thread about " what tman is going to do with the money after he extorts it (by his own standards) from the alleged debtor.
The point is for the slower members here
1. THE DEFINITION OF BLACKMAIL AND EXTORTION pertaining to giving members RED TRUST FOR IT.
Have you got that now??
If ALICE is clearly guilty of extortion/blackmail and can be given red trust for telling bob ( who has just grabbed her phone and is now walking away with it) that if he does not return it she will report him to the police.
By creating a "tit" for "tat" scenario, Alice can be said to be blackmailing Bob. There is the perceived agreement if you return my property, I will not notify the police. Do something for me and I'll remove the negative consequence of your actions from the table. Now would Alice be punished, charged or sentenced for this - No at least not in my country. Should the police become involved their advice would be to always notify them and file a report even if you've recovered the property.
Rightly so, Alice may not realize that by letting Bob off scott free, she is only setting the predator on a path to the next victim, who may not be so lucky.
The act of getting money from people or forcing them to do something by threatening to tell a secret of theirs or to harm them.
Their own standards.
Then TMAN is clearly guilty of blackmail/extortion.
This is about the DOUBLE STANDARDS employed by DT members here when certain behaviors SUIT THEIR OWN FINANCIAL GAIN or their own purposes.
How much clearer can I make this??
The problem is if you allow DT members to WEAPONIZE the trust system to PUNISH other members for deeds they themselves commit but do NOT get punished. You are permitting a 2 tier system to flourish.
Which part are you all having issue understanding??
Other than that. NOT THAT IS IS RELEVANT
Making far more serious threats than " encouraging others to review a members public post history" doxing plus other implied threats that could endanger the members life.
Making a STRANGE deal where apparently he withhold the DOX from investigators if he gets paid?? or what the fuck else is the point of saying to the alleged debtor I will reveal your dox if you do NOT pay me 650 bucks for a 1 satoshi loan I just bought?
I don't see TMAN saying he will give loyce the 650 bucks NOT THAT IT MATTERS.
So if there are any points you are not clear on speak up but stop cluttering and derailing my threat by conflating DOUBLE STANDARDS with specific legalities you "believe" are relevant to certain countries , and if you believe TMans is going to give the money to loyce anyway.
Transparent Rules that are applied equally to all members - have you got that now??
No point saying to people that are being punished by the CLEAR double standards, double standards that are permitting undeniable scammers and scammer supporters to punish other honest members whilst creaming off the top rev streams from themselves..... WELL DONT WORRY ABOUT THAT.... just live to your own standards??
No thanks. I will make sure the SAME standards are applied equally to ALL members.
Double standards = scamming.
Double standards WILL BE highlighted and constantly repeated when and where they are on topic and relevant. No ignoring , enduring, putting up with or accepting. NONE.