I was just attacked with Red trust by Lauda partially in reference to my postings in this thread.. I deserve a negative rating for speaking my mind and exploring contrary points of logic? I don't think so..
Do you want a diversity of ideas or an echo chamber?
But he says if you stop saying things he does not like/agree with he "may" later not consider you malignant .... so just turn into a lauda assfeltching clown (ask LFC, pharmacist, suchmoon, moronpigsnoz or any of those for a guide of how to perform) and you may get the red trust removed.
Red trust is very useful as the stick , merit is the carrot - when used together the echo chamber is pretty much guaranteed.
Red trust for virtue signalling? I thought he already warned you you may get a flag or tag for suggesting free speech should be permitted previously?
Have a care though, I mean saying the board should not become an echo chamber is kind of virtue signalling according to him since that is kind of like the same thing as permitting free speech
Until these scammers and their scammer supporters are removed this will happen to anyone that
1. brings up his observable pasts behaviors
2. say anything he believes may impact upon his rev streams here.
Anyway good to see OG has come and explained his side of it. Seems to be the end of the matter I guess.
Seeing the quote TMAN plastered by OG all over this thread makes me wonder why OG ever removed laudas red trust. I mean that is just 1 incident when you start to realize that is the slim edge of the scamming wedge if lauda does not warrant red trust NO member deserves red trust.
Him and ANY DT including him should be blacklisted by now.
I mean the initial post was really just about the forked bitcoin alts right? unless this was a set up from the start.