Good job, you can re-present information already presented. This discussion was always about executive branch subpoenas and their validity. You go ahead and use your topic sliding to call it an "out" if you like. I was very specific because you are extremely predictable and I know you would pull some tertiary bullshit like this out and claim it is proof. You think they are different than "legal subpoenas" anyway, so I am not too worried about your expert criticism no matter how much you and your entourage stroke each other off.
You've claimed they didn't issue any "real" subpoenas prior to Oct 31st. You've made blanket statements about that. You were just shown one proving you're wrong and you can try and twist it how you wish but that doesn't change the fact..
Yeah. I'm not going to bother with that "legal" thing again. Not my problem if you didn't comprehend what I was referring to at the time. I will give you that it was a poor choice of word on my part but given the context of the conversation at the time it should be been obvious what I meant anyway.