The evidence in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206971.0
is not insignificant.
Whomever decides this, please understands that there have been some interesting bans and ban evasion uncovered that this person is supporting which is an alt of a banned member.
The way it unfolded; in my eyes, is highly suspicious and merits careful consideration in the matter of him being a merit source.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206971.0
is not insignificant.
Whomever decides this, please understands that there have been some interesting bans and ban evasion uncovered that this person is supporting which is an alt of a banned member.
The way it unfolded; in my eyes, is highly suspicious and merits careful consideration in the matter of him being a merit source.
Just for the record, wolwoo is admittedly showing some emotional reactions in defense of a local section, but he has no connection whatsoever to the allegations raised in any of the threads you are quoting...
Some people are attacking DT1 members for merely including (I'm guessing) goraset in their trust lists for a while, but truth be told, it's very unlikely that these DT1 members from the Turkish section were even aware that goraset may or may not have had a few alt accounts which were banned (it's the first time I've ever seen it brought up anywhere on the forum)...
Some people who have recently lost their DT1 status are now digging up years old threads to make some flimsy connections, and then accusing people indirectly based on Trust list inclusions; thus leading to Wolwoo's emotional warfare in those threads
Regardless I congratulate Marlboroza for his detective work, I presume Turkish section might now be the most closely scrutinized part of all internet forums everywhere...
Its your behavior. Its your words. Its your actions.
Today's record of your post history makes it self evident why I feel the way I feel; on top of the fact that you are making unsubstantiated pseudo-claims of racisim and whatever else.
Own up to it.
Don't go jumping to the defense of someone positively connected to a banned person as to be a previously banned person. This is why I think you are suspicious. FYI: old information being "dug up" to prove someone is indeed a previously banned member insults you somehow?.... wow... I just do not know how to provide a response that is more logical than this very paragraph.
Someone who responds when un-provoked like you do/did; and in the manner that you did (containing what could unambiguously could be considered threats) does not contain the cores of "a source of merit" in my eyes.