No it is exactly the same issue from the start. Whether they are legitimate or not depends explicitly upon who they are issued to as the executive and legislative branches are co-equal. You still haven't produced the subpoenas under dispute no matter how thirsty you are to craft this tertiary bullshit into a win.
See? This is what I was talking about. You are worming your way out of having to admit you were wrong about no subpoenas being produced by the house and shifting the focus to obfuscate this fact.
You keep getting proven wrong, and then shifting the debate to something else, and then you are proven wrong there, so you shift it again.
For someone who talks such a huge game your knowledge of these issues is very superficial.
I feel like you're just trolling us at this point so I'm bowing out. Its impossible to debate someone when they are incapable of debating honestly.
This was the initial premise. If there is any worming going on it is you worming your way out of the burden of proof that the subpoenas issued to the executive were valid or even ever existed. Goodbye for now until you bow out again when you can't restrain yourself and or you run out of arguments.
Meanwhile, after being presented with documents in another thread:
OOO court documents, very official! Clearly everything you say is true, you referenced official court documents after all.
Thanks for proving once again you are completely unable to separate politics discussed here from forum issues. You belong nowhere near any trust lists as you are controlled by your emotions and are unable to rely on logic.