Re: Calling for SENSIBLE DEBATE on this use of the trust system ( not regarding us)
When you open a topic and you see this :
you know it has to be good.
And yeah its kinda rare for CH. But to be honest I have to agree with him. you know it has to be good.
it should be removed,...
Yes, it should be, now that I'm a DT1 I wanted to propose something good, that in this kind of issue Trust System (Leaving Feedbacks) shouldn't be used freely without a valid reasoning, and to be specific on Trades or what so ever we can make use of this Trust System truly operational that is said to be fair.In this case Lauda should have just leave a Neutral or just exclude and ignore you, Normal person would use that AFAIK, but as we all know ever since we have an issue of abuse on the Trust System there are still folks out there that didn't care about shits.
Some one has bad - mouthed you, Is it really right to put a Negative on a user's account?
-Hell, No.
(Now I remember that shitty guy blurryeyed/IconFirm...)
There is no conflict of interest other than you trying to attack me for calling you out on your bullshit virtue-signalling on everything.
The reference for the negative.I don't see anything that shows eddie is untrustworthy. Skepticism should be a part of all discussions, otherwise we will get virtue signalling due to the social pressure of the dominant side.