Erratic judgement ? Could you please quote some of them and prove that they are Erratic ?
In one thread you are accusing P2PB2 of being a scam and in another you are suggesting them to use escrow for signature campaign, to create new account to evade negative trust...errr...to promote their, how you said it, "scam exchange". You can't have it both ways.
That's correct. But they would find a way to proceed with that campaign any way. I just wanted to make sure that campaign participants will be paid and Lauda almost agreed on escrowing their funds (I do not know what happened between them at the end) But it seems that I made a huge mistake, because I guess they are not going to run any campaign. Anyway, as I stated in my previous post, I am out of that deal forever and they can do whatever they want.