Now Gumbi writes that it is worthless to spend thousands of dollars on a Martin Armstrong WEC seminar / conference because what Martin Armstrong says there is meaningless. Even while he says he does not know about this EURCHF trade.
Who wants to even consider these people who try to promote themselves with such nonsense? How much worse can it get?
More. He says that Martin Armstrong is innocent because "the federal conviction rate exceeds 98%". Meaningless nonsense.
This has already been discussed
As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan.
The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda.
Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.
Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.
The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing.
I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.
Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events:
Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
Who wants to even consider these people who try to promote themselves with such nonsense? How much worse can it get?
More. He says that Martin Armstrong is innocent because "the federal conviction rate exceeds 98%". Meaningless nonsense.
This has already been discussed
here
- no point repeating.As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan.
The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda.
Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.
Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.
The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing.
I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.
AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.
The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up.
Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."
Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.
The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up.
Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."
Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.
Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events:
Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.
See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog