I'm very happy with the WIN project forward movement and the impact it is having on the Ionomy 2019 vision. I was hoping that new requirements for 2020 wallet will come out of our discussion of the current ionomy defects. Step 2 of solving the defects are to have open discussion in public arena. These discussions might generate a solution or new requirement for the 2020 wallet. Please cut and paste the defects and present them to your Discord chat rooms for open discussion. I will bet that one of the recommendations is implement 12 ION coins block reward or dump POTx design & implementation wasted effort. ION coin has been advertised at POS and will continue to flourish as a innovative POS 4+ economic model.

ION 4.0 ionomy 2019 with IIP 6 Plan Defects
1) No decent return of investment to new investors
2) Lack of user knowledge in interest/usage using very complex ION wallet
3) No expectation of decaying project completing on time
4) No defined customer base for use with added depressing functionality
5) Reduction in rewards for all ION wallet 4.0 owners
6 Reduction in rewards for all ION sharenode owners
7) Distribution of Atom holder rewards are biases on empty promises
Non-existence Air-drop of Ionomy collateral resources to community
9) Litttle value left in Ionomy asset
10) ION Blockchain becoming depository for "worthless" tokens
11) REWARD ION community with 12 (8 + 4) coins for Block reward
12) Block Reward NOT enough to pay for hosting ION wallet fees
13) Misrepresenting number of masternode owners on IIP 6 vote to sway "yes" opinion
14) Lacking enough wallet/masternode resources to grow and maintain a healthy network
15) Ecosystem requires large number of transactions to be effect which there are NOT
16) No explanation of ION coin in other markets or exchanges
17) Which kiddie investor wants to risk using buggy BETA level of incomplete product
18) Hold ionomy management liable to coin investors for complete ION & Ionomy products
19) Wild's Depot R & D team able to predict advanced 2020 ION network & growing Ionomy ecosystem
20) What PIT(s) are eligible for being on the ION blockchain
21) Matlack's authorization to 5 yr FREEZE block reward to control deflation on coin and ecosystem
22) Total disregard of IIP-WildOnION-Node-Responsibility created by ION community (received public acceptance)
23) LACK of acknowledgement and current need  for ION improvement proposals 66, 7, 8 & 10 to grow thriving ecosystem
24) How long till Ionomy investors see a draft copy of 2020 ION white paper
25) NOBODY to BLAME except chief strategist of Ionomy management
26) ionomy openness to share sneak peaks for upcoming 2019 functionality using more advertised milestones other than SOOM

BTW: Mr. Korvas, I firmly agree that there will be no response to this cry for additional information to this accurate Ionomy ecosystem status. There is none left/available in the ionomy management staff to provide a real current status of the failing economical model/vision. The ionomy team currently does not have any VALID ION proposals to guide them thru the next phase of development in the next year. The continued path chief strategist Mr. Matlack is using does not provide any growth in the 2020 Ionomy vision because of the following DEFECTs in ionomy's future plans:

1. Lack of VALID ION proposal in 2020 Ionomy ecosystem to support ION Core's design & development
2. ION Core Developers wildly slinging code at Mr. Matlack & Pfeiffer's current depressing economic model/dream
3. STEALS/uses Mr. Onion's WIN & IIP concept giving no ION BOUNTY reward to really talented System Engineers & DEVs
4. Matlack's GOAL by deleting and REMOVING competitively competing WORK EFFORT
5. Ionomy unfairness to listen or CONSIDER other ION Improvement Proposals from CRYPTO community
6. IIP 2 CLOSED with status of "REJECTED - NOT in accordance with IIP 1 standards"
7. IIP 6 PENDING with status of "Not Legal or Acceptable" to encourage a "Bait & Swap" product scam to Ionomy investors
8. VOTE from Ionomy community on ION improvement proposals 7 thru 14 & 66 for public acceptance/comment of IIP