Oh gawd... you are going to accuse me of engaging in a witch hunt, too?  Seems to me that I just raised a legitimate connected concept.  I recall OGNasty asserting that there were no complaints, and if there were no complaints, then so be it.   I have life experiences that have shown me that when dealing with people there are frequently if not always some complaints.. and surely, some complaints are materially relevant and others are not.  Let's say, for example, that one of the investors was owed 10BTC, and OGNasty said that he was going to send the 10BTC within 72 hours; however, it took him a week to send the 10BTC.  There might be a complaint about receiving the BTC late, but in the end, many might conclude that the late sending of the BTC was not necessarily a material breach, even though OGNasty had represented that he would send the BTC within 72 hours.  Now if he did not send the 10 BTC or he only sent 2 BTC that might be another story. 

Another example would be if OGNasty said that he was only going to send 2 BTC because he was only paying 20% of the amount owed which was apportionate to the whole amount of the funds that were available, but if OGNasty later got reimbursed the additional 8 BTC with the presumption that OGNasty was receiving that additional reimbursement to pay off any additional claims, there might not have been any complaints if the intended recipient did not realize that OGNasty had received the additional 8BTC but had not used those funds for reimbursement....

So, in any case, the absence of complaints might not prove the point that is at issue, and if some investors later find out that they were provided with false or misleading facts, then they might choose to later complain even though they had not complained earlier.   I am just saying that complaints might or might not be relevant, even at a later stage of looking into the matter.


Perhaps everything is ancient.  I have no fucking clue.  If new evidence comes out, and affected people just find out about the new information, then the situation might no longer be "ancient" because there is the revelation of new information. 


I don't know.  I already revealed how my attention was drawn to this, which was initially the various posts about the airdropped coins that led into this information, and if there is just digging up old information then I may have missed that, and I have no intention to rehash old information, to the extent that might be happening.