As usual... you try to muddy the waters. Twist, twist...
The fact is Pac is a decentralized and a private blockchain belonging to a private company, belonging to a narcissistic CEO, now.
So I recommend anyone to think twice before investing to pac global.
There is hundreds of better project, lead by real professionals.
I feel bad for that guy who just lost 800k pac from a banned address (cryptopia). Coz if the court who is in charge of the liquidation release the coins, he will not be able to receive them anyway. If there was a little chance for him to recover, now it's definitely dead thanks to Drew's blind politics.
You are the one consistently getting things wrong (on purpose or not) - every second post of mine is about simply correcting your mistakes and misinterpretations.
For that reason, literally nothing you say or write can be taken as a fact, and needs to be checked and re-checked.
Now you show your real face. Attacking the form, typos, etc... To discredite my arguments.
That just shows that I am 100% true. You can't attack the arguments so you attack the form.
Basically, this chinese expression concerns you directly: "When a Wise Man Points at the Moon, The Fool Looks at the Finger"
Do you really think people are that stupid cookiess?
Soon Cookiess you will see a bunch of beautiful and well written articles about Pac, and how it is decentralized. As well as how the CEO is in conflict of interest.
Thanks me later
Unlike you, I do not think that people are stupid. Please be reminded that it is you who actually called everyone holding PAC "morons" just a little while ago.
Am I only correcting the form and the typos? Of course not, half of your central arguments that you use to prove your points are simply wrong - there is a large amount evidence in this very thread that you cannot properly read and understand simple things which are clearly written out or need a bit of research to be properly identified. For example, you claimed multiple times that the PAC Global CMO is mechnical enigneer, but he is not. There is rather big difference between that occupation/education and the one PAC Global CMO currently has. For a more recent example, in the post above you again claim that the PAC is a private blockchain, but one finds following:
"When we talk about public blockchains, what most people are really talking about is a public open blockchain. Its a blockchain where anybody can write data to the blockchain, and anybody else can come and read that data."
or
"In a private blockchain, only the entities participating in a transaction will have knowledge about it, whereas the others will not be able to access it."
(the source of the latter:
https://www.blockchain-council.org/blockchain/public-vs-private-blockchain-a-comprehensive-comparison/)
from which is clear that PAC is not a private blockchain.