It's a great pool, that's why it's always has a ton of the network

I'm not sure why you say it's well above 51%, talking about forking or double spend attacks is not relevant for scrypt. We have ~4GH/s on hash.so, so "we" have >51% of flap for quite some time.
The only valid concern is DDoS attacks, and flap network loosing tons of hashing power but with KGW even it is not an issue, coin would retarget itself quickly.
More info in here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/flappycoin/comments/1yihen/seems_this_pool_httpsflaphashsoindexphp_is/cfkvxhpI guess I need to write this up somewhere, because it keeps happening quite often, I can't complain tho, it means that my pools are great

I'm not sure why you're posting this, because non of that is true.
51% attacks work just as well on scrypt coins as they do on bitcoin. There's no particular difference between these coins that makes 51% less of a risk.
51% should be actively avoided.
Your assertion about KGW is incorrect as well. KGW actually makes a DDoS attack more powerful and more effective.
An attacker could massively drop the difficulty almost instantly by attacking the largest pool.
Due to KGW adjusting difficulty so fast, the attacker would see a very large increase in coins mined per khash.
On coins that retarget much slower (hours/days), a DDoS attack will only reduce the competition in finding blocks, but not directly reducing difficulty (as it would take a longer time for difficulty to adjust).
This would make such an attack not as effective as it would be against a KGW coin.