They need to be thrashed out so that they are objectively verifiable and a clear detailed explanation can be given with examples that substantiate that the person was either rejected or accepted in a fair way that is not easy to abuse.
Why do they? As I said above, people are not hired or are fired in real life without any sort of detailed explanation all the time. Everyone knows from your endless rants that you don't like the merit system, but why should the rest of the forum have to live by your opinions? If a project is paying money to hire someone to do a job, then it is entirely up to them what metrics they use to select the person they are going to hire for said job, even if you think those metrics are flawed. You're not paying to hire the person, so why should you get a say in who they hire?
You have alts?? we I do not think it would be fair for alts to be on chipmixer because it is very limited and others should have a chance.
I don't have alts and that's not what I said. Alts are banned on ChipMixer anyway.