[edited out]
Now we can discuss the extent to which one is more harmful than the other, but I (and - again - I suspect more people around here) am (are) not up for that.
It is difficult to appreciate your perspective, sbogovac, in terms of your seeming desire to speak up for what is good or not good for the forum community, regarding forum topics to be discussed and/or explored.
Twitchy is providing evidence and arguments for a theory. Of course, some other members are throwing in their perspective, too and providing links to other evidence and theories in a kind of crowd sourcing way (that sometimes might support existing evidence and arguments and sometimes negate the same), and it is up to members (including yourself) to decide for themselves the extent that they are "up to it" or not and whether they are going to give such evidence and logic any weight at all or completely say that Twitchy and others who support such Twitchy evidence and logic is full of shit or not.
If you
read back a couple of posts you will notice I am saying nothing about Twitchy's argument(-ation). I simply reacted to Tecshare's statement that a legendary member was engaging in "petty interpersonal battles" with another legendary member. And pointing out that that behaviour was mutual.
Now, if you think that that behaviour (by either one of
them) is actually doing anything good for this community you'r totally entitled to that opinion. Mine should be clear by now, but let me quote someone who put it much more clearly then me:
Which, BTW, brings us back on topic; because it would be really nice (especially for OgNasty's
own reputation) if this
was to be cleared up crystal clear. But I also do not really see any "real trade complaint"...
