Re: "The-One-Above-All" abuses self-moderated threads - Non-Reputable Behavior
I only glanced through the various posts of this thread, because no one's got time for focusing too much time and attention on that diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All.
However, in my previous posts I had mentioned: 1) that I do not tend to post in self-moderated threads of cunts like him and 2) in another of his disingenuous posts, he implied that he was not deleting posts by asking me to provide evidence that he was deleting posts. We all know that he is full of shit, but anyhow here is some additional evidence of deleted post from today.
I will put it here, since it seems to be somewhat relevant to this thread, and I suppose posterity, to the extent that matters in connection with anything that shill/troll does.
By the way, cunt-twat, The-One-Above-All, deleted my post in that thread, and then responded to such post in his self-moderated thread. Fuck that little twat. I am not responding to him in the self-moderated thread. It is a BIG ASS waste of time. However, I might respond to him in a non-moderated thread to the extent that there might be any substance there, such as in this thread.
If I need to take it somewhere else. I realize that not too many members read this thread anyhow because they are likely to get bored (or more likely annoyed) with anything that the twat TOAA says. I will apologize in advance to potentially clutter up more of his potential meaningless responses in this thread, to the extent that he might choose to respond, herein, the little sleaze bag... and to the extent that I will respond to his anticipated and likely nonsense.
>>>>>>>>
However, in my previous posts I had mentioned: 1) that I do not tend to post in self-moderated threads of cunts like him and 2) in another of his disingenuous posts, he implied that he was not deleting posts by asking me to provide evidence that he was deleting posts. We all know that he is full of shit, but anyhow here is some additional evidence of deleted post from today.
I will put it here, since it seems to be somewhat relevant to this thread, and I suppose posterity, to the extent that matters in connection with anything that shill/troll does.
By the way, cunt-twat, The-One-Above-All, deleted my post in that thread, and then responded to such post in his self-moderated thread. Fuck that little twat. I am not responding to him in the self-moderated thread. It is a BIG ASS waste of time. However, I might respond to him in a non-moderated thread to the extent that there might be any substance there, such as in this thread.
If I need to take it somewhere else. I realize that not too many members read this thread anyhow because they are likely to get bored (or more likely annoyed) with anything that the twat TOAA says. I will apologize in advance to potentially clutter up more of his potential meaningless responses in this thread, to the extent that he might choose to respond, herein, the little sleaze bag... and to the extent that I will respond to his anticipated and likely nonsense.
>>>>>>>>
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted .........
Sissy runs away from debate but still hiding there giving merit to people spouting garbage. Well done whataboutbob just demonstrates what a pathetic weasel you are. Keep hiding sissy you will never debunk one of our central points and you know this. You have been clearly demonstrated to be a pathetic little bitch who cries to red trust when you get put in your rightful place.
Naaaaah he's just responsible and knows he's time is better spent at people or members deserving .....
"his time" moron.
Besides his time is better served splurging him moronic mentally deranged drivel to idiots like you who are very deserving of it. haha
That does not refute the clear undeniable points we are making in the initial post. It rather serves to substantiate them.
But serious why the "WE" ??
Are you working with 3-4-5-6 or whatever on that keyboard there ?
I have 0 interest in the whole TOAA character, maybe only the "WE" term is it like T= a person O= a person A= a person A= a person ??
(Oooow yeah, for perfect English writing, you don't have to come to me thats right, strong point, nobody knew that one before, nice....)
Hahahahaha..,
You know that usually I do not post in this fucktwat's self moderated thread, but it is quite hilarious (maybe even ironic) that you, mic, are asking about the purported "team" of this diptwat... hahahahahaha Not that it is an irrelevant question, because diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All's, does constantly use such stupid ass troll/shill reference to his interweb's persona.
Of course, I already mentioned diptwat's use of the royal "we" in an earlier post in this thread (which probably can be easily found), but of course, diptwat refuses to admit why he is actually continuously using such royal we term,
He just seems to be a fucking silly ass loser shill/troll who may or may not have a team, and to the extent that he has a team(handler) that is helping him out with his content, themes, etc, then hopefully (on a personally fulfilling level, not that anyone should give too many shits about a person who seems to be employed to engage in such non-constructive posts) he is actually getting paid in bitcoin and able to stack a few sats rather than spinning his wheels with ongoing largely irrelevant nonsense spreading.
<<<<<<<<<Quote
Ignored.
Sissy runs away from debate but still hiding there giving merit to people spouting garbage. Well done whataboutbob just demonstrates what a pathetic weasel you are. Keep hiding sissy you will never debunk one of our central points and you know this. You have been clearly demonstrated to be a pathetic little bitch who cries to red trust when you get put in your rightful place.
Naaaaah he's just responsible and knows he's time is better spent at people or members deserving .....
"his time" moron.
Besides his time is better served splurging him moronic mentally deranged drivel to idiots like you who are very deserving of it. haha
That does not refute the clear undeniable points we are making in the initial post. It rather serves to substantiate them.
But serious why the "WE" ??
Are you working with 3-4-5-6 or whatever on that keyboard there ?
I have 0 interest in the whole TOAA character, maybe only the "WE" term is it like T= a person O= a person A= a person A= a person ??
(Oooow yeah, for perfect English writing, you don't have to come to me thats right, strong point, nobody knew that one before, nice....)
Hahahahaha..,
You know that usually I do not post in this fucktwat's self moderated thread, but it is quite hilarious (maybe even ironic) that you, mic, are asking about the purported "team" of this diptwat... hahahahahaha Not that it is an irrelevant question, because diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All's, does constantly use such stupid ass troll/shill reference to his interweb's persona.
Of course, I already mentioned diptwat's use of the royal "we" in an earlier post in this thread (which probably can be easily found), but of course, diptwat refuses to admit why he is actually continuously using such royal we term,
He just seems to be a fucking silly ass loser shill/troll who may or may not have a team, and to the extent that he has a team(handler) that is helping him out with his content, themes, etc, then hopefully (on a personally fulfilling level, not that anyone should give too many shits about a person who seems to be employed to engage in such non-constructive posts) he is actually getting paid in bitcoin and able to stack a few sats rather than spinning his wheels with ongoing largely irrelevant nonsense spreading.
Well done retard now that post clearly demonstrates
1. it is not on topic or relevant to the central points in our initial post
You are the retard because obviously it is on-topic. You just don't like that the contents of the post do not support your spin.
2. there are NO observable instances as required in our initial post
Have no clue about what you are talking about with this gobbledeegook.
3. derailing off topic crap,speculations and false accusastions.
you are not really saying anything - except that you believe the on-topic post is off topic. So fucking what?well done we deleted it and will continue to do so until you understand you need to adhere to the rules in the initial post you pathetic gimp.
Don't worry about my posting in your self-moderated thread. Why the fuck would I post in such a thread of some idiot like yourself who is mostly just engaging in propaganda in such a thread? I did make one or two posts in that thread, and the last one got deleted, as I suspected that it would because it hurt your lil feelings.
TLDR: You got nothing but whining and hoping for participation in your little scheme in such a way that just wastes the time of any participant in such thread because they know that they have good odds of getting deleted if whatever they say goes against your little spin attempts.
NOT ON TOPIC AT ALL
The topic is regarding the specific observable actions of bob after coming to our thread about blackmail/extortion
How the fuck has your shit post about our handlers or royal, lies about our trollling... got anything to do with that you dumb shit?? stick to the specific points.
If you have no clue what observable instances are then don't post on the thread. How can you conform to rules you claim you have no understanding of???
Get a dictionary and have a read moron.
You need to voice your opinion " cunt" and then "cunt" you need to present observable instances (quotes of posts here ) that demonstrate or corroborate what your are asserting is true??
Got it "twatnozzle". When you understand and can come back to the thread we will be happy to pull you to pieces then. Got it "cunt"
What is it with you retards that all joined around the same time obsession with "twats" and "cunts"??
Got to love your other bogus point you made here "cunt"
I doubt that you are really saving anyone or clarifying matters with your ongoing unsupported conclusions, ie that this is a witch hunt, and your other various convolutions and ad hominems etc.
double standards there "cunt"
No of course you are welcome back to the thread. Stick to the central points and bring some corroborating evidence (observable instances) to demonstrate you did not just pull it out of bobs ass before slobbering it all over my thread.
Also try to voice your opinion without sounding entirely confused and befuddled ... think it all over before you start hammering it out on your sticky keyboard.