Sorry to see that you don't seem to understand engwish.
Regarding that above linked thread; I see that you are quite the self-entertained drama queen. Surprises me that you are allowed to propagate such - non-contributory content.
And claiming that people that are fighting for transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all members are the BAD guys I don't think you are fooling any one really.
You are fighting for stirring shit. Seems to be your specialty.
I am suggesting you are supporting bobs clearly trust abusing actions YES.
I just came to this thread to post my deleted thread.
LOL I love how you say I was only replying to some other person (who was not debating anything to do with the central points mentioned in initial post) then when we just say that is no excuse you say....oh well I don't accept your summary LOLOLOL
This point that you are making is clear as mud to the extent that it is relevant to any possible at-issue point.
What are you saying then If we were getting you all wrong.
You(s) (
look I am being courteous by referrring to you(s) in the plural....
) seem to have a tendency to kind of lump matters together, whether subject or members, so there is that.
There is no substance in your answers at all with regard refuting anything we have said.
I did not know that I needed to refute anything. I just posted a deleted thread, and you confirmed that you deleted it. So, the subject seems to be over. You admitted the whole point that I was making.. Thanks for your cooperation. You are such a nice guy(s).
you were offtopic and didn't bring any observable instances = get it now?? LOL
I get that you are like a broken record with unimportant points, so I have observed that instance of an observable, if that counts for anything.
