I am more focused on everyone else observing getting the full backround of the motivations behind this targeting, and the long term consequences for this community if this kind of Stalinist behavior is tolerated.
To everyone else observing it looks like you are barking at anyone who
questions is presenting assumptions and speculation as facts.
Fixed that for you. Also what is it like speaking for "everyone"? Sounds like a cool job.
I doubt that you are really saving anyone or clarifying matters with your ongoing unsupported conclusions, ie that this is a witch hunt, and your other various convolutions and ad hominems etc.
That is all irrelevant. Any conclusions I make are independent of the fact that the conclusions against OGNasty
require assumption and speculation and are not conclusive proof of anything. I don't have to prove my conclusions. You have to prove your conclusions, that is how burden of proof works.
Look at all the evidence and decide for yourself how likely it is that that is what happened, and let me know if you can think of any other scenario where he didn't steal any funds.
Sure thing.
As far as the BTC144, it's not impossible that after receiving the last 3 payments from Pirate in August he used a completely different wallet with completely different funds...
It's entirely possible pirate was lying.
There is a lot more but that is not the point. The point is it is your burden to prove that there is no disconnect, not for everyone to prove your assumptions wrong.