What are still trying to prove with your righteous indignation? You're doubling down on a losing trade and that strategy has two likely outcomes: a tiny gain or a big loss.

I said what I needed to.. That their was reasonable doubt in my mind that you had any bot at all, and basically supported that you might have a bot..
I said what I wanted to say about that and then this all got boring until now that we might get to see some results..
 
I'm still not sure if their is any bot at all.. These orders could be manually placed and you're just saying their is a bot doing it, since they are well within the bounds of capability of even the slowest trader..

Yes, I have serious doubts about any "backtest engine with machine learning", and trying to program a low frequency swing trading bot with such long trade times..

I don't really understand, if you know what a market is going to do long term well enough to program a bot to trade it, what do you need a bot for at all?

To me a bot's advantage is it's speed to be able to trade a spread and flip what slippage you can catch, faster than I could place orders manually..
A market predicting bot? IDK about that..

I'd be more interested in investing in a bot that makes 100-1000+ trades a day, keeping 20+ orders on both sides of the books at all times, just picking little pieces here and there of what can be picked up from one side and dropped back on the other side, winning a little more often than loosing, and steadily returning just a little at all times..

I'd have much more faith in the legitimacy of a bot doing that, than a bot that thinks it can swing trade, making only a few Hail Mary trades here and there.. But we will see..

A bot that shorts the hunny badger with a bunch of leverage? Heh..  

Waiting to see more trades..

And a bump for you, since all press is good press according to you anyway..