Re: OgNasty Ponzi passthrough and ponzi fans.. BTC losses everywhere he goes
Twitchy clearly stated he has NO CONCLUSIVE PROOF OF FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING. IT is merely speculation.
It's not merely speculation. There's a shitload of evidence. What I stated was that the evidence "proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he pocketed BTC144"
If scammers were only labeled such when it was proven that it would be impossible for them not to have scammed....nobody would ever be labeled a scammer.
Could you take the default trust list drama to another thread please?
But you are SPECULATING he did not pay it back via another account right??
Speculation implies there is no firm evidence.
It's not merely speculation. There's a shitload of evidence. When you take it all into consideration, it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he pocketed BTC145
If you wake up in the morning and your yard is wet, but you didn't see it rain, would you consider it just speculation that it rained because someone could have come and sprayed your yard with water while you were sleeping? No. The wet yard proves beyond a reasonable doubt that it rained.