1. You do not know the owner of the output address of the "missing" funds.
2. There are no victims seeking redress or making accusations of theft.
3. EVEN IF you are right the amounts are so small as to not really make any sense for a very trusted member to trash his reputation over. Such an account could easily sell for well over the amount allegedly stolen, therefore it makes no sense for some one to do this for monetary gains when they simply could have just sold the account and associated signatures for a much higher return.
Are any of these three points incorrect? Please explain in detail if you think so.
You never responded to these points. I wonder why.
How long will you continue to avoid addressing these points?
He can't respond to these points because they are all true, and it totally undermines the speculative narrative he is desperately trying to push. As you can see he is already laying the groundwork for shifting to another accusation to push once again clearly demonstrating this is about targeting the man OGNasty, not exposing any wrong doing.
Should I assume from now on that when you ignore my direct questions it's because you know I'm right?
1 true, bitcoin is fungible, you can't actually track individual bitcoin unless the transaction includes the entire balance. There are clues though. He's made ~6,500 transactions over the past ~8.5 years. More than 60% of his darknet(silk road) and gambling(satoshi Dice) related transactions occurred between June and August of 2011.
2 I've explained to you at least 3 times already.
3 If he thought there was a very low chance of getting caught then it does make sense. Even if he could sell the account for $1700, it would basically be giving a green light for someone to use the account to scam. Steal the money and hope you don't get caught so you can convince more people to invest in future ponzis (like BFL).