Begging for 100% solid proof that he was reimbursed won't magically make proof appear. We've got someone saying he did reimburse – someone who has nothing to gain from making that up (which, btw, should not be confused with considering Pirate "trustworthy"), and someone who's either avoiding the question or has poor writing skills.

So, it's not "us" making you frustrated, it's the situation and what we have, so far. And that situation demands asking questions.

You don't.

I've posted links to every piece of evidence I've found, including evidence that has proven my own previous theories wrong.  Just look at it and come to your own conclusion based on the evidence instead of begging for people to explain it to you or walk you through how to find it.  It's all in this thread and you don't need to take my word, or reputation, or anyone elses into consideration.

I will save you a bit of trouble though, If you're looking for proof that the chances that Og didn't steal any money is 0.00001% or greater, or if evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he only stole BTC165 doesn't matter because it was only worth ~$1700, or if you don't think evidence that shows it was likely that he stole much more but there is some doubt, or if you don't think Ogs history of profiting off giant scams without risk by collecting other people money is relevant ,then  don't bother - you definitely won't find it.