Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: OgNasty Ponzi passthrough and ponzi fans.. BTC losses everywhere he goes
by
TECSHARE
on 18/12/2019, 09:39:02 UTC
so 144 coins.

did not he repeatedly state he invested coins .

he did. lots of posts show he said he put coins into this pirate club.

so now you need to prove those 144 coins belonged to whomever.

i rounded a  bit
aug 6.    1 btc was. 10.75. x 66.8. = 725
aug 13.  1 btc was 11.86.  x 39.2. = 453
aug 17. 1 btc was 13.31.   x 38.0. = 505

I get 1683 in usd.

so did he simply keep that as it was what he invested?

we don’t know

was some of that paid to a third party investor

we don’t know

did it belong to multiple third parties and og kept it wrongly

 we dont know.


when og had 3 million plus in funds did he keep them safely
we do know answer is yes.


my biggest concern about og was he may have made some coin with digibyte in a gray manner.

not this.


to op when you can answer the questions we dont know let us know.

Exactly. All the same mob members who have been attacking OGNasty forever now are here repeating over and over again how they have proof, but hey have nothing of the sort. The only 100% absolute fact here is no one knows where those funds went, to who, or why. This point is not even being debated, just being glossed over in favor of repeating "there is proof" ad nauseam without ever presenting it. This is 100% about targeting OGNasty. None of these people here accusing him give a flying fuck about anyone that was supposedly victimized or this community in general. This community is simply a tool for them to punish their adversaries as they have demonstrated repeatedly in the past.

EDIT:

And of course this same mob of people is making sure I pay a price for speaking up here in the form of more trust system abuse. The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now. I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   "Dishonest. Wouldn't trust."