You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.
You're not being red trusted for holding an opinion. This is what the referenced link says:
Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well).
You were doing quite a bit of attacking in that thread. Maybe if you would have presented your
opinion in a more neutral tone, it wouldn't have been seen as an attack designed to distract attention from the main issue, and possibly silence others.
It all really depends on whether the majority of the community agrees more often with you or with Lauda.
You'll really have to make a better case for yourself if you want your rating removed. I would honestly suggest being more humble and open-minded - and less hostile - going into the future.
Right, the fact that it was left now for an event that happened months ago is just a total coincidence is it? By "attacking" you mean pointing out the accusers have no evidence of theft and a history of making baseless accusations against OGNasty? Now my tone needs to be approved by you?
Silencing others? How exactly, by disagreeing with them and receiving unjustified negative ratings? Are you fucking kidding me? If you did any more projecting you would need to get a part time job at a movie theater. I would honestly suggest you go fuck yourself with your feigned moderation.