So what Armstrong is doing, he is effectively attacking the mainstream media through Wikipedia by extension only. No surprise here because he has an axe to grind with the justice system. The fact that he hits Wikipedia very hard in the process will not give him any points because most people like Wikipedia.
Again, this discredits Martin Armstrong.
Again, this discredits Martin Armstrong.
Yeah. Appears to be the case.
So we should for some reason trust his articles which he rarely even sources. Source is himself only sometimes.
I am not saying we should trust msm either, but why would I trust him? Where are his sources? In fact, he sometimes even sources the very publishers he's trying to discredit.
Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/press/wikipedia-fake-news-propaganda-tool-of-the-deep-state/
Most schools no longer accept Wikipedia as a valid source for citation in universities.
Whatever, what's his source for that claim?
Is it... the very wikipedia disclaimer?
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Schools#Can_students_cite_Wikipedia_in_assignments.3F
Caution is advised when using Wikipedia as a source. In most academic institutions, references to Wikipedia, along with most encyclopedias, are unacceptable for research papers.
So what's the workaround? Just use the same sources as wikipedia does. We are back to square one. Lol.