I am seeing a repeating theme of the inversion of the burden of proof and people demanding OGNasty prove his innocence rather than people proving his guilt.
Nobody is demanding anything.
We just want to know what happened.
Pirate said he repaid Og in full. Og said he didn't.
Og is the only person who can answer if pirate's sworn testimony to the SEC is true or not.
Yeah you're right, people are just making a string of accusations attempting to impugn his character over and over again until he is forced to prove his innocence rather than accusers proving his guilt = no one demanding anything.
You are continuing to twist this into things its not about. TwitchySeal hasn't posted in days. How is asking a question the same thing as "making a string of accusations"? This is why some people consider you to be untrustworthy and/or a troll. I know you don't care what they think, but I'm just letting you know: this behavior is why they think what they do.
All the accusers have is speculation, and the ambiguous statement of a convicted felon.
There was nothing ambiguous about pirate saying he had repaid Og in full. He even spelled out O-G-N-A-S-T-Y for the record. Again, you are just lying. For what reason, I have no idea. If you didn't keep churning out bullshit I wouldn't feel the need to keep correcting you, BTW.