Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: More trust system abuse by Lauda
by
TECSHARE
on 21/12/2019, 15:17:23 UTC
I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic.
Sure scare quotes are on topic, take a look at this post again:

Quote
I have no idea who is right or wrong here, neither do I care. Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well)

I couldn't reference this thread as it might be misinterpreted as you being involved in the original ponzi-case, which you are not.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.msg53378525#msg53378525

Your move goat fucker.
There are no moves rabbit fucker, it is all in your head. I figured out that topic title is misleading, and you are presenting yourself as a "political victim", but it is your actions and delusions which are causing you trouble in the first place:

Subject: More trust system abuse by Lauda
The usual mob of perpetrators is at it again, this time taking retribution for daring to defend one of their targeted individuals. The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now. I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.

This is a blatantly obvious pattern of abuse of anyone who dares to question this targeted abusive behavior. These people belong no where near having any kind of influence in a trust system, because to them it is simply a tool to use to punish people they don't agree with. They couldn't give a fuck less about the community, the community is just a tool they use to jerk off their egos.

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   "Dishonest. Wouldn't trust."


Your actions:
None of your conclusions are supported by the evidence and are 100% speculation.
And then you said this:
I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway.
You are one delusional prick.

You know what, everyone can click on your trust page and follow links, read threads, your posts and make their own conclusion. For me, you are a troll Mr. Tec's hare, a big one. I said what I wanted to say here so I am out. Going to ignore you for few days, until my brain cells recover from your mental gymnastic.

This doesn't explain anything or relate to the topic, this is just a string of selectively edited quotes you threw together that you think looks persuasive. None of it explains why Lauda's rating is not abusive. Also I see you are taking a page out of Twitchy Seal's book and editing my quote to serve your narrative. Here is what I actually said:

~

TL;DR

[I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway. Victims might not have known they were robbed. Who needs victims anyway? We can still use this as an opportunity to allow certain people here to pursue personal vendettas. After all what is important is that we pass judgement on people even if there is no harmed party seeking redress.]

As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts, but you presented the edited quote in such a way as to make it look as if it were a straight forward statement I made in my own voice. The fact that you need to edit my quotes to try to convince people says volumes.