I accused Og of lying based on sworn testimony that is on public record and blockchain evidence that confirms/proves funds were returned to Og from pirate. I added him to my distrust list -- whoopty f'n doo. He's not being tried or convicted of anything because, as I've already explained to you yet you still don't seem to grasp, this isn't a court room. He could perhaps present another side to the story that I hadn't considered, but he doesn't feel its worth doing so, and frankly I don't blame him.

Am I missing anything? You feel the need to do some more barking still?