Yes you are right, will work on the receipt for scam accusations, what you say sounds wayyyyy more professional and very constructive suggestion, the way you said it makes alot of different compared to the chipmixer agents, they were all about accusation, negative marketing, and defaming i would never want my badge on any of them ever , it will be a disgrace to my website's good name
Eddie13 more or less repeated what I asked you...
Imagine never being on Bitcointalk before, googling "bitcoin mixer", and ending up reading this thread..
All the chipmixer signatures do look like shit if someone didn't know better..
Not to say concerns aren't valid, but wearing signatures does have its downsides..
It might look like that, but if someone posted some concerns from newbie account, they would be accused of spreading FUD from newbie account and "they are scared to post from their real account so their voice doesn't count", or accounts with signature are usually accused of spamming for cents, or accounts without signature are usually accused of just spreading FUD.
Non of that really addresses anything, final line, "who" is pretty much irrelevant.
what you say sounds wayyyyy more professional and very constructive suggestion, the way you said it makes alot of different compared to the chipmixer agents
Are you really pulling this card?
However if they enter a wrong address then its donation towards our system and we pay tax and buy a bottles of wine and enjoy with the Russian girls with the money.
***puff puff pass Thursday ***