I am just now finding out about Yobit's shady business dealings today. I didn't even realize they had a Bitcointalk account.

It's interesting that people will give zero flak to anyone that suggested Yahoo support the Cryptotalk campaign or the moral high superiority of "stopping spam" trying to play moderator. If that makes me hypocritical, I would assume that makes everyone else hypocritical who wore a Cryptotalk signature too, including Yahoo. Yes, no one likes spam. It would not be hard to report to the mods all the spam and ban the posters as a community effort. If you all knew this was a ponzi to begin with, why were these points not brought up before the changing of the signature to all participants of the campaign including the manager? Why would people advise Yahoo to even support the campaign instead of letting spammers spam and having theymos ban the campaign outright? Promoting Cryptotalk.org is not the same thing as supporting a ponzi scheme. I said this before and I'll say it again. There was a line, and Yobit crossed it. I removed the signature and there are currently users who have chosen not to remove it . That's fine, that's they're prerogative. But there isn't a doubt at this point that Yobit is a scam waiting to happen.