I'm in the UK - I don't own a gun.
If I get home from work next Tuesday and I catch Mrs.Dreamer at it hard with the postman

- they're both gonna get beaten with my baseball bat - maybe a few fractures might ensue.
But they won't get their heads blown off

And I won't do a life sentence.
I'm not going to venture an opinion as to wether the citizenry of the US should have access to firearms - as I know it evokes
very strong responses.
I'll just say that I'm glad to be in the UK

.
So... let me get this straight.
Because you have murderous tendencies (you can easily kill someone with a blow from a baseball bat), people shouldn't be allowed to own firearms?
I'll just say that I'm glad you are in the UK.

LOL - no - the point I was trying to make was that if I was put in a situation such as that described with Mrs. dreamer (for eg.) and the postman there would be a fair chance I would have a rush of hot blood to my head. It can happen to any of us - don't kid yourself. The difference is for me that I would resort to a cricket bat and not a firearm (I don't actually own a baseball bat - I suppose I only mentioned it cos thats what people seem to have as a last line of defence/protection in their homes, at least in the UK).
I reckon the hot blood could last for maybe 45 seconds - the damage I could do with a cricket bat in 45 seconds is limited (especially since, lets not forget, that the only reason Mrs dreamer is banging the postman in the first place is that he's 3 inches taller, 2 stone heavier (muscle not fat) and 15 years younger than me

) - but with a firearm the 2 of them are gonna end up dead in 40 seconds - leaving me 5 seconds with which to turn the gun upon myself.
All for 45 seconds of hot blood.