was expressing views we don't agree with.
Incorrect. I have am not interested in his views or personal opinions not related to the trust system or trust in general.Use the Neutral and you can honestly put whatever you feel about the user.
So naive, and hopefully young. 
[2] The promotion of a ponzi in their signature is also just a:
Not what you led with for wanting to create a flag. I believe that was already removed from the signatures yesterday. [/quote]
I'm only liable for what I say, not for what you understand. The user has demonstrated clear red-flags, whether your first thought is that I was solely relating to a single post I quoted or not is not my issue. It's a you issue.
I don't see how requesting and walking away from that role helps in molding the system in a way you see fit.
The system is inherently broken and politicized, way beyond it's previous political issue which was concentrated only around a few single individuals. You don't see, because you think inside a limited box that I've previously mentioned. It comes down what you intentions and goals are. If it is money that you seek and pretending to do good, then stick around here with the current system. Seems to be very efficient at doing "good" these days. 
Not that I'm saying that that's the only motivation to stick around, seems people have been misinterpreting my posts a lot lately.