Such a pleasure having a doctor between us.

I think you proved you know your stuff and it looks like you are a real doctor from your writings. I wanted to ask you a question regarding your methodology however. You say you will
find the relevant bibliography / citation to prove something wrong. But since there are two opinions in contrast, does that not mean that you can find two bibliographies, one saying the
way you see it and one saying it the way others see it? How trustable are academic sources and why can we trust them that they provide relevant information?