Post
Topic
Board Services
Re: Yobit.net signature campaign
by
yahoo62278
on 26/12/2019, 20:29:50 UTC
blurryeyed left me a negative feedback for the signature of the airdrop that Yobit conducts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=885996). My signature does not contain any reference to the exchange itself and to its Investbox (http://archive.ph/Vhuel).

I had the signature of the Cryptotalk forum after Yobit changed the conditions of the campaign to advertising Investbox with a return of 10% per day, I removed my signature and put the signature of airdrop as soon as solved the question https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188047.msg53431322#msg53431322.



Here's my message that I wasn't ready to bear the signature of the Ponzi scheme:

I am glad that the question of changing the signature by Yobit has been resolved. I didn't want to keep the Ponzi scheme advertisement in my signature.


blurryeyed is abusing the trust system. Sorry yahoo62278, this report is made to prove his misconduct. Please do not remove it. I will as soon as the matter is resolved.
He has a right to his opinion, as does everyone else. He is not DT but you can ~him if you disagree with his opinion.

Do not send a retaliatory feedback as that really helps noone. He has tagged me as well. Its life, move on.


To everyone getting the disabled for inactivity, you're not gonna be put back in the campaign. Admins are not reading anyone.

How many days did you not post? Or how many days did you not put the correct sig? I had the cryptotalk sig for 2 days before adding the new sig and my account was not disabled.