"trading crypto" is not what happened here. CryptoSparks had no ability to do what he was claiming (risk-free winning trades) but with the help of scam apologists like yourself he still managed to collect a few hundred bucks to gamble away on his ridiculous leveraged martingale bets.
Will you support the flag now or are the red flags still not "concrete" enough?
The flag requires "concrete red flags", I.E. evidence, not just suspicion. This is not a valid flag.
Being a bad trader still doesn't make him a scammer.