Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 4 from 4 users
Re: IS GIVING RED-TRUST THAT NON-EXPLANATORY ?
by
eddie13
on 29/12/2019, 18:02:45 UTC
⭐ Merited by hacker1001101001 (1) ,TECSHARE (1) ,DireWolfM14 (1) ,dragonvslinux (1)
Merited OP
Merited the TS post
Countered
~Lauda added

Lauda is clearly flying off the handle with abusive negative feedback most recently including abusive trust against TS.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.0
And abusive trust against me.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206862.0
And now this..

It's well past time to ~Lauda people..
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Do it..


BayAreaCoins, Hhampuz, subSTRATA, AT101ET, teeGUMES, Steamtyme, Blazed, Lesbian Cow, chronicsky, dazedfool, minerjones, DaveF, ezeminer, notserp, wheelz1200, OgNasty, Gyfts, monbux, DiamondCardz, monkeynuts...
army of pajeets
You are all just "pajeets" to Lauda..

Do you really think that I care what theymos said
--and leaving somebody a neg based on that isn't what Theymos wants the trust system used for.
Have most of you guys forgot the lessening of the guidelines post the introduction of the flag system? Yes, you can now leave negatives for many more things (and no, it isn't abuse/misuse like it was before - to a lesser extent now). It is the flag system that's for scams nowadays, and the trust system for more "opinionated-things".

Trust flags

you should not use trust ratings to attack a person's opinions

Lauda has no respect for the guidelines given by theymos and is running around belligerently abusing their DT2 position..

It's time to end it..
We should not accept such runaway authoritarians here staying on DT..

Good outweighs the bad my ass.. DT should be held to a MUCH higher standard than that..

And my favorite..
I am completely against freedom of speech when it is used by virtue signallers like eddie13