What a surprise, another ~Lauda thread.
Unlucky for you, I only really post in Speculation that doesn't show trust, so I couldn't give a fuck.
Not true. DT1 could stop trusting this member for starters, so that ~Lauda is no longer a flag-abusing DT2 member
More people (like you) should take Lauda's advise way more often, this isn't the first recommendation:
Lauda's one liners are best, period.
Today I got a navigate trust rating for sending merits to a post I found informative...yes read again sending merits, and it was by someone who has lots of inclusions from well-known members here.
Mine is not the only example, many users are just buried under this type of trust abuse.
Mine is not the only example, many users are just buried under this type of trust abuse.
Unlucky for you, I only really post in Speculation that doesn't show trust, so I couldn't give a fuck.
Lauda is the only one that is able to do something about the negative feedback you have received.
Not true. DT1 could stop trusting this member for starters, so that ~Lauda is no longer a flag-abusing DT2 member
Just ~Lauda and fuck off if you don't agree with it.
More people (like you) should take Lauda's advise way more often, this isn't the first recommendation:
I have to say, leaving negative feedback for sending a single merit for something a person likes is a bit much not? Lauda?
Like it involved some very good members and stuff.... I also wouldn't appreciate some negative trust for just a difference in opinion ...
Like it involved some very good members and stuff.... I also wouldn't appreciate some negative trust for just a difference in opinion ...
Just ~Lauda and fuck off if you don't agree with it.
Lauda's one liners are best, period.
(crushed)
Quote from: Lauda
¯\_(ツ)_/¯